Antidote and Hemingway-bench leaderboards C

AI benchmark · Enterprise Workflows

Publisher
Surge AI
On X
@HelloSurgeAI ↗
Tier
C why
Snapshot

Open benchmark ↗surgehq.ai/benchmarks

Full listing name: Antidote and Hemingway-bench leaderboards - https://surgehq.ai/benchmarks

Latest from Surge AI on X

@HelloSurgeAI ↗

What is Antidote and Hemingway-bench leaderboards?

Surge AI's benchmark leaderboard ranks AI models by their capacity for rigorous reasoning and real-world mastery.

  • General capability mostly

    “This is our ranking of models, measured by their capacity for rigorous reasoning and real-world mastery.”
    surgehq.ai/benchmarks ↗

Tier C

C

Niche: a handful of models scored, or built by an RL vendor.

How much stands behind a tier: usage, who backs it, a confirmed line from its own site or paper, and a clear read on X. High with three of the four, medium with two, low otherwise.

  • built by Surge AI
  • in curated RL directories (2 pts)
How we got to tier C
  1. Adoption: built by Surge AI. Tier C.
  2. Not yet read on X.
  3. In curated RL directories: 2 points, a floor of C.
  4. Confirmed: a line from its own site or paper places it.

A clear view on X moves a tier one step up or down; most entries don't move. How tiers work.

Training methods

Methods Antidote and Hemingway-bench leaderboards uses, offers or builds for, with public evidence: its own website says so, or two independent sites do.

  • “Overview: Anthropic is One of the World’s Leading AI and LLM Companies The Problem: Building Trustworthy, High-Quality Human Feedback The Solution: Rich Human Feedback via Surge AI’s RLHF Platform Results: Anthropic’s Claude – a Safe, Highly Capable, State-of-the-Art AI Assistant”

    surgehq.ai

    “Children (and adults and AI) learn from preferences and rewards: praise a ballet dancer when her movements flow, and she’ll become better and better. The RLHF data we generate embodies the richnesses and subtleties of the world — the notes that separate the ordinary from the inspired, Salieri from Mozart.”

    surgehq.ai
  • “To check whether ComplexConstraints measures something worth optimizing for, we built a companion training set of 1,000 examples, and trained Qwen3-4B using RLVR with a judge model.”

    surgehq.ai

    “ComplexConstraints and Beyond: Expert Rubrics for RLVR”

    surgehq.ai
  • “…fic work that real jobs demand. Frontier models such as GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.6 solve fewer than 30% of tasks when all expert-authored rubric criteria must be satisfied. Using this environment, we train GLM 4.6 with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and adaptive clipping. After a single epoch of training, the model improves from 25.37% to 36.76% task pass rate on held-out evaluation tasks. More importantly, these gains transfer to out-of-distribution benchma…”

    surgehq.ai

    “- CoreCraft (enterprise RL Environment): GRPO with rubric-based rewards moved GLM 4.6 by +11.4pp on held-out tasks and transferred out-of-distribution: +4.5pp on BFCL Parallel, +7.4pp on τ²-Bench Retail, +6.8pp on Toolathlon — while Pass³, a reliability metric requ…”

    surgehq.ai

Where Antidote and Hemingway-bench leaderboards sits

Its realm in the universe, live. Hover a star for its name; click to open it. Open it in the universe

The galaxy could not load. See every vendor on the board.

Next: browse all benchmarks. Entry from the RL Research daily scrape of public sources, 2026-10-11 snapshot.