CoreCraft B

AI benchmark · Multi-Domain

Built by
Surge
On X
@HelloSurgeAI ↗
Tier
B why
Snapshot

Open benchmark ↗arxiv.org/abs/2602.16179

What is CoreCraft?

CoreCraft measures whether AI agents can perform multi-step, domain-specific customer support work in a simulated enterprise environment with 23 tools, scored by expert-authored rubrics.

  • Enterprise work mostly

    “CoreCraft is a fully operational enterprise simulation of a customer support organization, comprising over 2,500 entities across 14 entity types with 23 unique tools”
    arxiv.org/abs/2602.16179 ↗

Who built CoreCraft

Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2602.16179 ↗

Tier B

B

Established: 15 or more models scored, or curated RL directories rate it.

How much stands behind a tier: usage, who backs it, a confirmed line from its own site or paper, and a clear read on X. High with three of the four, medium with two, low otherwise.

  • built by Surge
  • in curated RL directories (5 pts)
How we got to tier B
  1. Adoption: built by Surge. Tier C.
  2. On X: unclear, none buzz No move.
  3. In curated RL directories: 5 points, a floor of B. Raised to B.
  4. Confirmed: a line from its own site or paper places it.

A clear view on X moves a tier one step up or down; most entries don't move. How tiers work.

Training methods

Methods CoreCraft uses, offers or builds for, with public evidence: its own website says so, or two independent sites do.

  • “Overview: Anthropic is One of the World’s Leading AI and LLM Companies The Problem: Building Trustworthy, High-Quality Human Feedback The Solution: Rich Human Feedback via Surge AI’s RLHF Platform Results: Anthropic’s Claude – a Safe, Highly Capable, State-of-the-Art AI Assistant”

    surgehq.ai

    “Children (and adults and AI) learn from preferences and rewards: praise a ballet dancer when her movements flow, and she’ll become better and better. The RLHF data we generate embodies the richnesses and subtleties of the world — the notes that separate the ordinary from the inspired, Salieri from Mozart.”

    surgehq.ai
  • “To check whether ComplexConstraints measures something worth optimizing for, we built a companion training set of 1,000 examples, and trained Qwen3-4B using RLVR with a judge model.”

    surgehq.ai

    “ComplexConstraints and Beyond: Expert Rubrics for RLVR”

    surgehq.ai
  • “…fic work that real jobs demand. Frontier models such as GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.6 solve fewer than 30% of tasks when all expert-authored rubric criteria must be satisfied. Using this environment, we train GLM 4.6 with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and adaptive clipping. After a single epoch of training, the model improves from 25.37% to 36.76% task pass rate on held-out evaluation tasks. More importantly, these gains transfer to out-of-distribution benchma…”

    surgehq.ai

    “- CoreCraft (enterprise RL Environment): GRPO with rubric-based rewards moved GLM 4.6 by +11.4pp on held-out tasks and transferred out-of-distribution: +4.5pp on BFCL Parallel, +7.4pp on τ²-Bench Retail, +6.8pp on Toolathlon — while Pass³, a reliability metric requ…”

    surgehq.ai

Where CoreCraft sits

Its domain on the map, live. Hover a logo for its name; click to open it. Open it on the full map

The galaxy could not load. See every vendor on the board.

Next: browse all benchmarks. Entry from the RL Research daily scrape of public sources, 2026-11-05 snapshot.