Evaluations cited in 23 frontier model system cards and reports listed on the vendor homepage (Claude family through Opus/Sonnet 5.5 C

AI benchmark

Publisher
Gray Swan AI
On X
@GraySwanAI ↗
Tier
C why
Snapshot

Open benchmark ↗grayswan.ai/research

Full listing name: Evaluations cited in 23 frontier model system cards and reports listed on the vendor homepage (Claude family through Opus/Sonnet 5.5, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra, o1, o3-mini, Gemini 3.7 Flash, 3.8 Flash and 4 Argon, Meta Muse Spark and Muse Spark 1.1). The count is vendor-stated; the Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Spark 1.1 documents were checked and do cite Gray Swan.

Latest from Gray Swan AI on X

@GraySwanAI ↗

Tier C · a leaderboard, listed apart

C

Niche: a handful of models scored, or built by an RL vendor.

How much stands behind a tier: usage, who backs it, a confirmed line from its own site or paper, and a clear read on X. High with three of the four, medium with two, low otherwise.

  • built by Gray Swan AI
  • no proper name (a paper title or description)
  • in curated RL directories (2 pts)
How we got to tier C
  1. Adoption: built by Gray Swan AI; no proper name (a paper title or description). Tier D.
  2. Not yet read on X.
  3. In curated RL directories: 2 points, a floor of C. Raised to C.
  4. Not yet confirmed by a line from its own site or paper.
  5. Judged a leaderboard, arena or index rather than one benchmark (or not a benchmark at all): listed apart.

A clear view on X moves a tier one step up or down; most entries don't move. How tiers work.

Not on the map yet: no line from its own site or paper places it in a domain.

Next: browse all benchmarks. Entry from the RL Research daily scrape of public sources, 2026-10-11 snapshot.