Focusable Monocular Depth Estimation A
AI benchmark · Vision
What is Focusable Monocular Depth Estimation?
Monocular depth foundation models generalize well across scenes, yet they are typically optimized with uniform pixel-wise objectives that do not distinguish user-specified or task-relevant target regions from the surrounding context. We therefore introduce Focusable Monocular Depth Estimation (FDE), a region-aware depth estimation task in which, given a specified target region, the model is required to prioritize foreground depth accuracy, preserve sharp boundary transitions, and maintain coherent global scene geometry. To prioritize task-critical region modeling, we propose FocusDepth, a prompt-conditioned monocular relative depth estimation framework that guides depth modeling to focus on target regions via box/text prompts. The core Multi-Scale Spatial-Aligned Fusion (MSSA) in FocusDepth spatially aligns multi-scale features from Segment Anything Model 3 to the Depth Anything family and injects them through scale-specific, gated conditional fusion. This enables dense prompt cue injection without disrupting geometric representations, thereby endowing the depth estimation model with focused perception capability. To study FDE, we establish FDE-Bench, a target-centric monocular relative depth benchmark built from image-target-depth triplets across five datasets, containing 252.9K/72.5K train/val triplets and 972 categories spanning real-world and embodied simulation environments. On FDE-Bench, FocusDepth consistently improves over globally fine-tuned DA2/DA3 baselines under both box and text prompts, with the largest gains appearing in target boundary and foreground regions while preserving global scene geometry. Ablations show that MSSA's spatial alignment is the key design factor, as disrupting prompt-geometry correspondence increases AbsRel by up to 13.8%.
Tier A · a leaderboard, listed apart
Widely used: a lab reports it, or 50 or more models are scored on it.
How much stands behind a tier: usage, who backs it, a confirmed line from its own site or paper, and a clear read on X. High with three of the four, medium with two, low otherwise.
- 75 models scored
- in curated RL directories (1 pt)
How we got to tier A
- Adoption: 75 models scored. Tier A.
- On X: unclear, none buzz No move.
- In curated RL directories: 1 point, a floor of none.
- Not yet confirmed by a line from its own site or paper.
- Judged a leaderboard, arena or index rather than one benchmark (or not a benchmark at all): listed apart.
A clear view on X moves a tier one step up or down; most entries don't move. How tiers work.
Not on the map yet: no line from its own site or paper places it in a domain.
Next: browse all benchmarks. Entry from the RL Research daily scrape of public sources, 2026-10-11 snapshot.