Gaze4HRI C
AI benchmark · Robotics
Full listing name: Gaze4HRI: Zero-shot Benchmarking Gaze Estimation Neural-Networks for Human-Robot Interaction
What is Gaze4HRI?
While zero-shot appearance-based 3D gaze estimation offers significant cost-efficiency by directly mapping RGB images to gaze vectors, its reliability in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) settings remains uncertain. Existing benchmarks frequently overlook fundamental HRI conditions, such as dynamic camera viewpoints and moving targets in video. Furthermore, current cross-dataset evaluations often suffer from a complexity gap, where methods trained on diverse datasets are tested on significantly smaller and less varied sets, failing to assess true robustness. To bridge these gaps, we introduce Gaze4HRI, a large-scale dataset (50+ subjects, 3,000+ videos, 600,000+ frames) designed to evaluate state-of-the-art performance against critical HRI variables: illumination, head-gaze conflict, as well as the motion of camera and gaze target in video. Our benchmark reveals that all evaluated methods fail in at least one condition, identifying steeply-downward gaze as a universal failure point. Notably, PureGaze trained on the ETH-X-Gaze dataset uniquely maintains resilience across all other conditions. These results challenge the recent focus in the literature on complex spatial-temporal modeling and Transformer-based architectures. Instead, our findings suggest that extensive data diversity, as exemplified by the ETH-X-Gaze dataset, serves as the primary driver of zero-shot robustness in unconstrained environments, while resilience-enhancing frameworks, such as PureGaze's self-adversarial loss for gaze feature purification, provide a substantial further improvement. Ultimately, this study establishes a rigorous benchmark that provides practical guidelines for practitioners as well as reshaping future research. The dataset and codes are available at https://gazeforhri.github.io.
Tier C
Niche: a handful of models scored, or built by an RL vendor.
How much stands behind a tier: usage, who backs it, a confirmed line from its own site or paper, and a clear read on X. High with three of the four, medium with two, low otherwise.
- 7 models scored
- in curated RL directories (1 pt)
How we got to tier C
- Adoption: 7 models scored. Tier C.
- Not yet read on X.
- In curated RL directories: 1 point, a floor of none.
- Not yet confirmed by a line from its own site or paper.
A clear view on X moves a tier one step up or down; most entries don't move. How tiers work.
Not on the map yet: no line from its own site or paper places it in a domain.
Next: browse all benchmarks. Entry from the RL Research daily scrape of public sources, 2026-10-11 snapshot.