MTG-Causal-RL D
AI benchmark · Game
What is MTG-Causal-RL?
Causal reinforcement learning (RL) lacks benchmarks for complex systems that combine sequential decision making, hidden information, large masked action spaces, and explicit causal structure. We introduce MTG-Causal-RL, a Gymnasium benchmark built on Magic: The Gathering with a 3,077-dimensional partial observation, a 478-action masked discrete action space, five competitive Standard archetypes, three reward schemes, and a hand-specified Structural Causal Model (SCM) over strategic variables. Every episode exposes causal variables, SCM-predicted intervention effects, and per-factor credit traces, making causal credit assignment, leave-one-out cross-archetype transfer, and policy auditability first-class metrics. We adapt a panel of reference baselines: random, heuristic, masked PPO, a causal-world-model PPO variant, and an architecture-matched scalar control. We propose Causal Graph-Factored Advantage PPO (CGFA-PPO) as a reference causal agent that uses SCM parents of win probability as factor-aligned critic targets with an intervention-calibration loss. All comparisons use paired seeds, paired-bootstrap confidence intervals, and Holm-Bonferroni correction within pre-registered families. Masked PPO and CGFA-PPO reach competitive in-distribution win rates and exceed the random baseline; per-factor calibration trajectories and leave-one-out transfer gaps expose diagnostic structure that scalar win rate alone cannot. We release the benchmark, reference-baseline results, and full evaluation protocol openly. By coupling a strategically rich, partially observed domain with an explicit causal interface and statistical protocol, MTG-Causal-RL gives causal-RL, world-model, and LLM-agent research a shared testbed for questions current benchmarks cannot pose together: causal credit assignment under masked action spaces, structural transfer across archetypes, and SCM-grounded policy auditability.
Tier D
Long tail: little or no usage data yet.
How much stands behind a tier: usage, who backs it, a confirmed line from its own site or paper, and a clear read on X. High with three of the four, medium with two, low otherwise.
- 2 models scored
- fewer than 5 models scored
- in curated RL directories (1 pt)
How we got to tier D
- Adoption: 2 models scored; fewer than 5 models scored. Tier D.
- Not yet read on X.
- In curated RL directories: 1 point, a floor of none.
- Not yet confirmed by a line from its own site or paper.
A clear view on X moves a tier one step up or down; most entries don't move. How tiers work.
Not on the map yet: no line from its own site or paper places it in a domain.
Next: browse all benchmarks. Entry from the RL Research daily scrape of public sources, 2026-10-11 snapshot.